| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
BCA
Member
Joined: Jul 02, 2011
Posts: 134
Location: Milton, Ontario
|
 Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2014 9:27 am Post subject: M38 Body reinforcement panels |
 |
|
| TB 9-2855-4, dated 27 Oct. 1952, dealing with the installation of the M38 hard-top, shows the 3-5/8" x 8" reinforcing panels at the rear upper corners of the body. It says they are required for necessary strength when using a hard-top. However MWO ORD G740-W6 dealing with these reinforcements didn't come out until 14 May 1953. Were the reinforcement panels ever installed at the factory on American M38's or was it always a field modification? 1952 Canadian M38's all seem the have the plates installed with factory-looking welding. ....... Brian |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wesk
Site Administrator
Joined: Apr 04, 2005
Posts: 16241
Location: Wisconsin
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BCA
Member
Joined: Jul 02, 2011
Posts: 134
Location: Milton, Ontario
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2014 12:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Wes,
I'll keep digging but there seems to be almost no surviving Ford Motor Co. of Canada records dealing with the M38 CDN. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Xamon
Member
Joined: Sep 18, 2012
Posts: 589
Location: South East Saskatchewan
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bill_F
Member
Joined: Apr 17, 2005
Posts: 891
Location: New Hampshire
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 7:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The funny thing is my USAF m38 had a hardtop on it, so it was an army only thing maybe??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wesk
Site Administrator
Joined: Apr 04, 2005
Posts: 16241
Location: Wisconsin
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 10:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Air Force and Army shared the tech data on the M series trucks. For example the M38 Operators and Maintenance manual is numbered for both the Army (TM 9-8012) and the Air Force (Technical order number 36A5-2-41)
Trouble with the USAF documents is they did not release anything public like the Army did with their TM's TB's and MWO's. In all likelihood the USAF issued a TCTO (Time Compliance Technical Order), their version of TB's and MWO's that would have covered the same topic.
Also with 50 year old surplus jeeps there's no way to determined when an Arctic top was installed on the jeep military or civilian installations.
_________________
Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100
Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules.php?set_albumName=Wes-Knettle&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bill_F
Member
Joined: Apr 17, 2005
Posts: 891
Location: New Hampshire
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 5:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I am pretty sure it had the hard top during its service with the USAF as it was the correct top and had blue paint on it, under the civvy white paint. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wesk
Site Administrator
Joined: Apr 04, 2005
Posts: 16241
Location: Wisconsin
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BCA
Member
Joined: Jul 02, 2011
Posts: 134
Location: Milton, Ontario
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2014 8:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Xamon, That is a bold statement about the destruction of records. Any concrete evidence that this was policy? I have heard people mention that Ford of Canada archivists have made this claim but maybe it was just an off-the-cuff remark to satisfy collector enquiries. The only hard evidence from Ford that I have seen is a 1952 Month-End Serial Number Report. However observation of actual data plates shows that stamped dates of delivery can drag on well past the month-end reports. For example the Report for November 1952 Month-End: "F-102135 - End of M-38-11/27/52" but there are several examples of M38 CDN's with "Delivered Dates" on the serial plate being well after Nov. 27, 1952. Both the serial number and the delivered date are neatly machine-stamped with the same type-face. Still a lot to learn - the info is out there somewhere. ... Brian |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wesk
Site Administrator
Joined: Apr 04, 2005
Posts: 16241
Location: Wisconsin
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2014 8:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
They weren't destroyed or at least no one declared them destroyed. Ford of Canada rep did post this in a written reply to one inquirey.
| Quote: | Hi Steve:
Part of the agreement with Willy's was that after production ceased, all records relating to the production (1952 & 1953) of the M-38 & M-38A Jeeps be turned over to the Canadian Military as classified material. What happened to the records after that is anyone's guess, as I have tried through the DND to access any records. We have only the serial number sequences for the units. Under license indicates that Ford was authorised to produce the vehicles here under the Willy's name (but with Ford of Canada on the data plate). As far as I know all the parts were produced here, not imported from Willy's, which was busy producing jeeps for the US Army at the time (the Korean War was taking place at the time). Of course, Willys provided all the design specifications for the jeeps.
Sandy Notarianni
Historical Consultant, Ford Motor Company of Canada Limited
CHQ 624A
|
_________________
Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100
Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules.php?set_albumName=Wes-Knettle&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Xamon
Member
Joined: Sep 18, 2012
Posts: 589
Location: South East Saskatchewan
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wesk
Site Administrator
Joined: Apr 04, 2005
Posts: 16241
Location: Wisconsin
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Xamon
Member
Joined: Sep 18, 2012
Posts: 589
Location: South East Saskatchewan
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Forum FAQ
Search
Usergroups
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
