Page 1 of 1
1953 M38A1 Radiator Support Rod question
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2019 8:47 pm
by Mike_B
I just noticed that my 1953 A1 radiator support rods are covered by a thin rubber covering. Is that factory and if so, why?
Thanks,
Mike B

Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2019 12:14 am
by wesk
I don't recall seeing any rubber layer on mine. It just may be an attempt by a previous owner to make the rods fit snugger and without rattling.
Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2019 8:58 am
by 4x4M38
Wonder if it’s undercoating.
Is that a Marine jeep?
Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2019 9:46 am
by danrothe2001
Mine had a thin layer of some kind of thin plastic coating on them. I redid it with plasti-dip like for tool handles. I assumed it was factory.
Dan
1953 M38A1
Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2019 2:51 pm
by keats
my m170 has the rubber coating on them
Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2019 8:35 pm
by Mike_B
danrothe2001 wrote:Mine had a thin layer of some kind of thin plastic coating on them. I redid it with plasti-dip like for tool handles. I assumed it was factory.
Dan
1953 M38A1
That what I was thinking about using if it was deemed factory. Mine were covered end to end including both ends...the only holes in the rubber were for the cotter pins.
Mike B

Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2019 7:08 am
by wilfreeman
Both of my Army a1s (53 and 54 models) as well as my 64 USMC had a rubbery coating on them. I Plasti Dipped the ones on the 53 that I restored but didn't have to do anything to the USMC ones - they were almost perfect.
Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2019 7:57 pm
by Mike_B
Anyone know WHY they were rubberized???
Thanks,
Mike B

Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2019 8:10 pm
by wesk
Since the attachment points cannot be actually tightened up to prevent movement it is a safe assumption they are rubber coated to prevent rattling and prevent corrosion caused by rattling and rubbing steel on steel.