MD Juan

Reviews and Comments on M Series Vehicle Parts: NOS, Reproduction, etc.

Moderators: TomM, wesk

Post Reply
User avatar
Bretto
Member
Posts: 1390
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 6:00 pm
Location: Orem, UT

MD Juan

Post by Bretto »

Has anyone notice the MD Juan post on other sites by the Mr Rommel Juan? Hopefully something will come out of it.
User avatar
daleric
Member
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 6:00 pm
Location: Auburn, AL

Re: MD Juan

Post by daleric »

Bretto wrote:Has anyone notice the MD Juan post on other sites by the Mr Rommel Juan? Hopefully something will come out of it.
Hmm, a link or a brief description of what you speak of would be most helpful.

Richard
User avatar
Bretto
Member
Posts: 1390
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 6:00 pm
Location: Orem, UT

Post by Bretto »

http://www.thecj2apage.com/forums/mdjua ... page1.html
Then there are a few in various forums at the G503 page.
User avatar
wesk
Site Administrator
Site Administrator
Posts: 16413
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Post by wesk »

Good of you to bring this topic up with a reference to Rommel's comments.

The tubs are not so bad today and most cases fit problems are in the ball park. A slip in and bolt it down fit is not possible but it is close. I look at their facilities and I really do not see a factory tub jig for each model jeep. This does put them at a slight disadvantage and combined with the fact they must reverse engineer the product makes it very difficult for them to please the entire market base. Using a 40 or 50 year old tub as a model for engineering to draw replacements tubs on is obviously going to lead to errors. Very small errors of less the 1/4" can result 2" or more errors some distance away from the original erred point.

Nice of management at MD Juan to stick their head up out of the fox hole and field the questions.
Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100

Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules. ... _album.php
User avatar
daleric
Member
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 6:00 pm
Location: Auburn, AL

Post by daleric »

Bretto wrote:http://www.thecj2apage.com/forums/mdjua ... page1.html
Then there are a few in various forums at the G503 page.
Thanks Brett. Interesting thread. I am intrigued to see what Mr. Juan may do with all the feedback.

Richard
User avatar
Xamon
Member
Posts: 593
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 6:00 pm
Location: South East Saskatchewan

Post by Xamon »

I am quite impressed with the mature nature of the discusion. They do seem like they want to make a better product.
User avatar
oilleaker1
Member
Posts: 973
Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 6:00 pm
Location: South Dakota

Post by oilleaker1 »

I too am impressed with the desire to improve their product. That's just good business. Don't forget, they make M38 bodies too! If anyone has one and has issues, now is the time to help correct them. Your input is needed. John
User avatar
wesk
Site Administrator
Site Administrator
Posts: 16413
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Post by wesk »

Also remember there is a serial number on the cowl, driver's side, just outboard of the hood hinge in the recessed area. Mention serial and model when posting issues.
Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100

Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules. ... _album.php
Post Reply